The study's primary purpose was to ascertain graduates' performance on the Teachers Licensure Examinations from 2005 to 2009 in terms of general education, professional education, and specialty. To collect data for this study, a descriptive-correlational approach was used in conjunction with a questionnaire. This study surveyed 145 respondents over a five-year period with indicated specializations. Purposive or purposeful sampling was used to pick the desired number of responders. Unlike in some other similar studies, when data were acquired exclusively from the school's registrar and PRC, the researcher required that respondents submit a photocopy of their transcript of records and PRC results together with the questionnaire in this case. The researcher's task of compiling these pertinent documents was made easier by the fact that practically all of the responders were former students, who had little hesitation in relinquishing their academic papers. This is where the study's legitimacy is established. Purposive or purposeful sampling was used to pick the desired number of responders. The studies indicated that the LET's overall rating gleaned 65 (44.8%) of respondents gave an overall rating of 75–79, 15 (10.3%) gave an overall rating of 80–84, and just 2 (1.4%) gave an overall rating of 85–89. A total of 82 respondents (56.5 percent) achieved a passing score on the national licensure examination.